shahine.com/omar/

homepage | Send mail to the author(s) contact

yet another Microsoft blogger

# Friday, December 08, 2006

Windows Mobile Shortcomings vs Blackberry

Two people that I know have written excellent articles comparing the latest breed of Windows Mobile Smartphone devices to the Blackberry. I've never used a Blackberry and I suspect most Microsoft Employees never have. As such our expectations of what a data centric smartphone should be like are probably lame. For example there are two features that the Blackberry has that are just killer features and I would have never expected from our own platform for a variety of reasons.

  1. When you place a blackberry in the holster it turns off the screen and buttons preventing any unexpected interactions.
  2. When you receive an email and go to grab the device within a specified time frame it will automatically display the email. What's that? You mean the device actually knows what I want to do?

Both of these are good examples of the harmony you realize when you create both the hardware and the software (like our favorite fruit company). The experience is simply unmatched. I doubt Windows Mobile will ever get there simply because of this fact, but also because most people at Microsoft who might simply do a drive by competitive analysis would never notice some of these features. The same way a Windows user would never notice the amazing ambient light detection on a MacBook Pro Keyboard.

Anyway, my co-worker, Steve Schreiber talks about his experiences with Windows Mobile and the Q and my fellow blogger Greg Hughes talks about his experiences with the Samsung Blackjack (my current phone).

My favorite idea is this one from Steve:

I find myself wondering if anyone who designs these “Blackberry killers” has ever used a Blackberry for any amount of time.  A good friend of mine has a Windows Mobile based Treo, which he uses to sync to his own corporate Exchange system.  When speaking of the dissatisfaction that he had with that device, and the same displeasure his wife had with her Q, he suggested that “those guys in your company’s Windows Mobile group need to (1) have their desktop Outlook turned off; (2) be issued Blackberry devices and have to use them for 30 days; (3) have the their Blackberries taken away and issued Treo or Moto Q devices for 30 more days.  If that doesn’t cause a light bulb to go off in their heads, then nothing will.”

I couldn’t agree more.  The only thing I can hope is that this type of exercise will happen before the next round of devices hit the scene and that Microsoft will hold their ODM partners to a higher standard before allowing them to ship with a Windows Mobile device.

I hope folks in the MDD Group (Mobile Devices Division) will take these two excellent write ups to heart and improve the experience moving forward.

 

Saturday, December 09, 2006 2:20:38 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
I wouldn't count on it. Microsoft overlooks these sorts of design details because the corporate mindset doesn't value and reward people who care about it. So those people don't get hired, and the people who are there (like you and me) have to do this sort of work "on the side" because it doesn't contribute to "shipping the software". It's all about shipping, not about the experience of what's shipped. For example, the Shutdown experience in Vista:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-0ZFmUbk1erC6prHGUJbW_UclZ3O1Sw--?cq=1&p=251
Dave Cortright
Sunday, December 10, 2006 9:18:01 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)

You had your new phone for a short while and figured out some new useful features just by using it casually. How hard is it for someone to use it for a full week at Microsoft for full time to learn the device inside and out and tell their team on how to improve on their own device. You should also have more confidence in your fellow employees at Microsoft. At least tell them about your "major" discoveries.
Abdu
Sunday, December 10, 2006 9:19:43 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)

You had your new phone for a short while and figured out some new useful features just by using it casually. How hard is it for someone to use it for a full week at Microsoft for full time to learn the device inside and out and tell their team on how to improve on their own device. You should also have more confidence in your fellow employees at Microsoft. At least tell them about your "major" discoveries.
Abdu
Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:24:33 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
I wonder if there is any chance that Microsoft will eventually produce their own Smartphone or Pocket PC/Phone device like they did with their MP3 player (Zune). Then they would control both the hardware and the software.
Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:09:58 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Now that Apple's officially announced their new phone I think there'll be even more pressure for Microsoft to come out with their own phone too. Although 100 patents on a phone and partnerships with Yahoo and Google makes it seem like Apple wanted to take every precaution to prevent someone like Microsoft from creating their own device.
Monday, April 14, 2008 12:47:20 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
My wife has a blackberry and I've been forced to use a Moto Q (free, from my company).

I'm about to smash this device into a brick wall. The frustration I get using this things outweighs its convenience.
Lee F
All comments require the approval of the site owner before being displayed.
OpenID
Please login with either your OpenID above, or your details below.
Name
E-mail
(will show your gravatar icon)
Home page

Comment (Some html is allowed: a@href@title, b, blockquote@cite, em, i, strike, strong, sub, super, u) where the @ means "attribute." For example, you can use <a href="" title=""> or <blockquote cite="Scott">.  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

Live Comment Preview